Marxism is wrong, and was a work
I saw this video, The Story of Stuff, six years ago, and when I was taking Cultural Studies at McMaster in 2003, I heard the same argument as an explanation of why a Marxist looks at things the way a Marxist does.
I channeled that Marxism was a work designed to teach impressionable young people with no life/work experience (and quite possibly something to resent) that the system where people are allowed to quit their job, free-market capitalism, is the oppressive one.
I also channeled that Averell Harriman was killed by Richard Nixon in front of a room full of dignitaries and actors in 1986, and as such, was unable to pass on to his predecessor, who eventually became Bill Clinton, the knowledge of how the Illuminati subverted the academy.
Mysefl, I learned about it to a degree, at least as regards control across societal institutions and across time, as well as Hegelian historical dialectic and controlling both sides of a conflct, in Antony Sutton’s America’s Secret Establishment: The Order of the Skull and Bones, which landed me on an Illuminati watchlist in 2004.
The rest—that Marxism is junk—I learned over the course of my third year of university, primarily. I’m one of the few people (probably) to do a Humanities degree from 2001 to 2005 and come out more conservative than when I went in.
The Earth is abundant
This is what’s missing from the analysis, and Marxist analysis in general: the abundance of the Earth.
Everything that is made is made from primary resources extracted from the Earth. Wood, metal, plastic from petroleum, uranium, silicon, cotton, food, animals etc. Humans merely have to locate them and extract them, and they merely have to do it without losing their shirt financially.
The Earth produces these things. The ideal is to manage their use sustainably, as the forestry management people do, for example. The lumber and paper industries are completely incentivized to ensure that there is a steady supply of raw material in the form of trees in the future. They can do this, they do do this.
And they do it well, as I understand it from a consumer’s point of view. Last time I was at Home Depot, they had a whole bunch of lumber to choose from. A lot of it. I’ve seen other places with entire yards of the stuff.
Fossil fuels
The Earth produces fossil fuels as well. This is a wonderful thing I’ve channeled: Coal does not run out. Oil does not run out. And they are here for us to use.
I channeled that the Centralia, Pennsylvania fire will continue to burn until someone has the time and resources to put it out, because coal continues to be produced by the Earth there.
Is it true that coal industries have continued to produce coal in the same locations in perpetuity? In England, Wales, and Scotland for centuries?
There is no such thing as the Greenhouse Effect
By the way, I’ve also channeled this, and I have an explanation—there is no such thing as the Greenhouse Effect. Poincare’s conjecture is merely conjecture, and it’s not consistent with what we know about thermodynamics and weather systems that involve air masses.
- Is it fair to say that one day’s temperature is not a matter or function or product of heat storage from previous days?
- Does that layer of greenhouse-gas-sunray-refraction not cease to exist every night when the sun goes down (I channeled that Joe Biden would point this out), and it gets colder until the sun returns again with more heat?
- Is it the case that if they are experiencing record temperatures at the Australian Open, it doesn’t affect whether or not the ice and snow in my driveway in southern Ontario will melt?
- Is it the case that the source of heat from sun rays is very far away, at the sun, and as such, no additional heat energy is added to the atmosphere after the sunray is refracted by greenhouse gases?
- Is it the case that if the proportion of greenhouses in the atmosphere, which is exhaled by trees and chlorophyll-bearing vegetation, triples from 0.04% of the atmosphere to 0.12% of the atmosphere, that more reftaction of what is ultimately the same amount of heat energy delivered to the atmosphere will lead to stored-up heat deposits in the air that surrounds us at the surface of the Earth (where the oxygen is), heat deposits that will not go away at night when the sun vanishes over the horizon as it does every day)?
- Is is the case that you could test the greenhouse effect theory empircally by building greenhouses side by side, controlling the air composition of each one, and measuring the temperatures inside them?
- Is it the case that if a location experiences a long stretch of hot weather, it takes a proportionately-long amount of time for that location to cool off? As in, it’s been hot for a week, it should take at least two days to cool off?
- Is it the case that the temperature in a location can drop ten degrees Fahrenheit in the course of two or three hours, because air masses moved? Is that what we experience?
Also, aspartame
And this isn’t related, but it’s fun: there’s nothing wrong with aspartame. Have at it. Breaks down into alcohol chemically, but your body can handle it just fine. Enjoy. Enjoy Diet (Whatever).
