My name is Daniel Butterfield. I was born March 22, 1980, at 10:22 PM, in Burlington, Ontario, Canada. I was a normal person until I was 35; in January of 2016 I started channeling and interacting with spirits.
When I was 39, I learned through channeling that I am The Creator of All-That-Is, the Lord from the Judeo-Christian-Islamic-Great Spirit-Brahmin-Shinto mystical revelations, the Source, the Divine Feminne, the spirit of femininity itself, incarnated and born to Her latest life in a human vehicle, Her first life as a man.
As such, I am the “Son of” the Lord, and the Christ, in that I am Her vehicle on Earth. I experience her presence within my interior mindspace and I experience Her and other spirits in . I also see spirits around me, though they appear as if they are within my mind and not physically there as if they were in the flesh. I am what Christians have called the Second Coming. I was asked “Will you be the Christ?” specifically upon learning who my Higher Self is/was.
The Divine Feminine, The Great Mother, The Source, the big blue being you meet when you die, is “The Void“, and everything is “ideas in the mind of God” in that She imagines everything into existence within her interior mindspace, from the inside out—that’s the causal plane, the “generative layer” of physical existence, and it has been physically isolated and identified as the interior of matter—the quantum. That’s why you see particles appearing and disappearing in and out of existence at that scale—that’s how things exist. They are generated from within, from the inside out.
I am also the first Rave, as explained by Human Design—a mutation in the species (we see it as Asperger’s) that will be standard for new humans born after February 5, 2027. My father, I learned through channeling, was the first person born with Asperger’s.
Introduction
You could call my political views “small-government conservative”. I am influenced more by the modernist tradition in general than by any particular thinker, though I have my favourites so far. I have my own perspective on matters, and my own sense of intellectual confience, informed by my unusual educational and career path.
I did a normal Humanities degree, in Communication Studies, at McMaster Universtiy in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, half-Cultural Studies, half-Linguistics, from 2001 to 2005, but I went in as a modernist and resisted postmodern critical scholarship as a perspective.
I attended the Business-Marketing two-year program at Mohawk College in Hamilton from 2006 to 2008. I worked in municipal government for about two years, then did two years learning Search Engine Optimization and ranking clients at a digital marketing agency, then three years in-house at Canada’s 21st-largest corporation, as their SEO Lead and Performance Analyst.
During my late teens, twetnies, and early thirties, I also studied the work of Marshall McLuhan, the Human Design esoteric knowledge system, the work of integral philosopher Ken Wilber, and I learned how to heal emotional wounds thorugh therapy and 12 Steps.
Government
In terns of Thomas Sowell‘s A Conflict of Visions distinction between a “Constrained” vision and an “Unconstrained” vision. The Constrained vision sees the world as limited and constrained, given that things are where they are in the moment, and you have to get to where you want from where you are. The Unconstrained vision sees what it wants and, as Robert F. Kennedy expressed it, asks, “Why not?” The answer is, “Because reality is indeed constrained.”
If you want the government to make the world a certain way, it requires hiring people to carry out the duties of enforcing the new rules—nothing happens for free, and a law is only effective if it is enforced. People already pool their tax dollars for necessities like infrastructure and utilities; it isn’t a practical expectation to expect governments to be able to enact any old thing.
People who work in government are not gods—they have career paths, and particular skill sets, and work experience, and they work in offices with email and meetings and work-life balance like anyone else. The government cannot work miracles—they are human beings, doing the best they can with a limited budget. (I worked in municipal government for about two years.)
When you’re a marketer, you can’t be idealistic. You have to be very realistic about how people do things, or you’ll lose money.
Great question to ask about an idea: How much would that cost to do?
The ethos at the City of Hamliton was the right one—these are the people’s tax dollars at work and it is incumbent upon government to make the best use possible of those tax dollars.
The future of humanity and the Earth—The “abomination of desolation”
To paraphrase George Carlin, “The Earth will be fine. The people” have to worry.
I learned, through channeling, in March of 2018 that the Book of Daniel from the Old Testament is about me—I am the Prophet Daniel. I am well-educated, I experience visions, and I have the Spirit of the Lord inside me.
This is from the Gospel According to Mark.
Chapter 13, Verse 2: And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
Chapter 13, Verse 14: But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea fell to the mountains:
In particular, the “abomination of desolation” is the coming end of civilization, our current system of mass production and mass food provision.
It was channeled to me two years ago, in 2022—Without me, and my Divine Intervention in the affairs of the planet, civilization will be gone in 70 years, by 2092, I AM here to be the Saviour in that sense, at the least.
Paradise on Earth, in the Christian-End Times sense, is this modern, technologically-advanced late-stage capitalistic world. We have solved the challenges of settlement, developed civilization, and human lives, as a result, are the most materially comfortable they’ve ever been. The challenge, however, is to maintain it, when such a thing has never happened before.
Every civilization that ever developed and evolved suffered the same fate—internal collapse resulted in compromised food production, and the problem is this: It takes an entire growing season to generate more food if the existing food stocks run out. It happens faster than people would think, given the plentiful food supply that people are used to. Remember—produce that shoppers buy in the Northern Hemisphere in winter is grown in the Southern Hemisphere and shipped.
Civilization and business are good, and you actually love them
We don’t want to go back to a world where we have to herd animals because that’s the most effective way to eat and live. We are used to our comfort, the comfort of our technologically-advanced nests.
• Do you like the idea of going back to a world without cellphones, cellular networks, or Wi-Fi-activated networked devices?
• Would you be happy living in a place like Black Creek Pioneer Village (I went there on a school field trip once)? Would you happy churning butter because that’s the only way to have butter?
• How does it sound to live in a house will old windows, doors and fixtures from the 1940s, 50s, or 60s, compared to a newer home build?
People don’t mind commercials and advertisements for products they like. People don’t mind commerce when it involves things they like. Even the most committed socialist will happily purchase and trade for art, recorded music, or craft items. And they will often wear mass-produced shoes and clothing like band t-shirts or Che Guevara t-shirts or Nehru jackets or sarongs that are consistent with their non-mainstream personal expression.
Generational epidemic of borderline and narcissistic personality disorders
I have also channeled this: Telling a child that he or she is smart during the pre-operational phase, when they are just learning to speak, doesn’t “make them smarter,” as child psychologists once suggested based on advances in operant conditioning; rather, it just makes them *think* they are smart, and they do so when they have not yet developed a sense of “self” that involves being a seff among peers your own age, which is the psychological stage, per Piaget, that happens around age six or seven or so. My brother, as a first-grade teacher, observed the differences among kindergarteners and the less-developed first-graders, some of whom can manage the “student” role better than others because they are farther along in their psychological development and awareness.
This advice—”Tell children they’re smart”—was propogated by Dr. Benjamin Spock in Baby and Child Care, particularly in the 1957 and 1968 editions. Spock would update the volume with the latest thinking in child psychology.
I have not yet looked into the subsequent editions that were aimed at Millenials/Generation Y, but I have had experience working with your “classic problem Millennial,” and it has happened twice. They are stories I repat to people now, about how clueless and arrogant these some of these young people are in some cases, and how it’s not a coincidence.
Marxist economic analysis is wrong
If you’ve seen “The Story of Stuff”—yes, that’s wrong. I’ve heard the Marxist economic criticism of capitalism summarized like this: “If everyone is taking a share from someone else, how is any saving happening?” What that analysis fails to consider is the abundance of the Earth: the Earth gives natural resources for free at particular georgraphic locations, and humanity merely has to extract them. That‘s where humanity can come out “ahead”—primary resources get turned into products by secondary industries.
It’s not the case that humanity “falls behind” because of capitalism. It is the case that Marxism was a “work”, a dupe, planted by the Illuminati in the 1840s, to subvert the academy by introducing a philosophy opposed to free-market capitalism, the system where enterprising people can build wealth, and the system where one can quit one’s job. Marxism is a ruse that plays on resentment, originally economic class-based resentment, by telling resentful people that it’s morally wrong for other people to have more than someone else does.
Using fossil fuels is okay and great, and by the way, there is no such thing as the Greenhouse Effect
Trade is sustainable. Using resources from the Earh is sustainable if we use our brains, as we do. The industries that use timber are the ones most heavily invested in ensuring that forests are managed and a steady supply of trees will available for future use. I’ve channeled confirmation of this: producing fossil fuels is something the Earth does. Fuels like coal and oil are here for us to use.
As Irwin Schiff described in How an Economy Grows and Why It Doesn’t, currency is credit notes. That’s why printing more “waters down” the currency—they are credit notes standing in for items of a similar value; a medium of exchange. “Money” is “stored trade value” from work, sale, or generous or ill-gotten sources.
I will be writing more about this in the future, but Poincare’s conjecture is merely conjecture. Simply: there isn’t “additional heat” added to the atmosphere because sun rays get diffused by water vapor and carbon dioxide, therefore sending those sun rays back down to Earth for additional heating.
I will do a thorough treatment of this later, but quickly: that sun refraction disappears every night when the sun goes down, after which it gets colder, and it only gets warmer again when the sun comes up; the “accumulated warming” theory doesn’t jibe with what we know about weather systems and temperature; and “average temperature” doesn’t make a difference as far as the ice caps are concerned. If it’s January and there are record-setting temperatures at the Australian Open, the ice and snow on my driveway in Canada doesn’t melt unless it’s above freezing in Canada. It’s also the case that a sun ray only has so much energy to deliver, and it doesn’t have additional heat energy to supply because it was diffused.
If you look at the graph of the Greenland ice core data from the past ten thousand years, you’ll see that the “hockey-stick” from An Inconvenient Truth was actually the long-term termperature trend emerging from a historical trough. According to that data, for most of the past ten thousand years, the Earth was warmer than it is now.
Capitialism is just people trading on their own, free to do so, and that’s why it “recovers”
The only place where there has been starvation or food insecurity in the 21st century is Venezuela, because they had a centralized, socialist command economy that failed that was overly dependent on petroleum exports.
Capitalist economies recover “naturally,” and “on their own,” without the need for intervention, because people are always incentivized to trade with each other. People generally don’t grow all their own food, and practically no one makes their own shoes. Very few people would be happy to actually see a world where footwear, like shoes and socks, isn’t mass-produced, but once again hand-made. They prefer to trade for these items. In a world of barter, vegans would have a very hard time.
China and the Soviet Union experienced mass starvation in the 20th centruy, not because of totalitarian evil, but because there is only so much food their farms can produce, and if there isn’t a curb on reproduction, it becomes necessary for portions of the population to be starved or killed. Malthus was not wrong—It is merely the case that the food production in the West was never strained by excessive population as it was in the Soviet Union under Stalin and in China under Mao. China instituted the one-child policy in response to this situation.
I learned through channeling that the Events of May 1968 in France ended because the patrons at a cafe insisted that the formerly active workers get back to work and supply them with more coffee, even though those guys were enjoying being on strike, too. It got violent, and the cafe owner was killed.
Equality is an ideal that doesn’t exist
To those who think that “unequal outcomes” are unfair, I ask you this: “What about that man who beat up your sister? Does he deserve the same as everyone else? Does he deserve the same as your sister? He beat her up!”
Also: how do you equalize housing? Who gets the unit that faces the water, and who gets a view of the building next door? Who gets the ground floor unit near the garbage bins? Who has to live in the part of town that’s far away from everything? Who gets the big room? Can you tear down the houses and rental units and rebuild them so they’re all the same size and quality?
And of course, there’s always sexual competition for the best mates/sex partners, too. It’s not an “equal” world there, and never could be. If you’re a believer in “equality of outcomes”, you might want to ask yourself why that’s the case. Do you resent someone about something? Something personal?
Do you like it when there’s someone who gets paid the same amount as you do, and they contribute nothing, compared to you? People only tend to like “equality” when it benefits them.
People only like “something for nothing” if they are the one getting something. When people give up something and get nothing in return, they generally hate it.
Problems in the academy
I have a hypothesis, that I have intended to explore for the past twenty years or so, that you can probably toss out any philosophy that’s ultimately grounded in the semiotics of Ferdinand de Saussure and Charles Peirce, as that’s a nineteenth-century philosophy of language, as if there wasn’t any thinking done in the field by the likes of Kripke, Frege, Wittgenstein, and Chomsky.
This includes the work of Michel Foucault. I’m aware of how that works: “Well, if you read the original Foucault, he basically proved it.” I’ve heard that at least twice. So I absolutely intend to read the orginal wokrs of Michel Foucault. I intend to read them and respond to them critically, as you do.
Marxism in the academy was a work of the Freemasonry/Illuminati people. Adorno and Horkheimer were instrumental in changing the base of resentment from class and economic differences to cultural and social differences. Once a department gets taken over by a Marxist as a department head, it stays a Marxist department, and no other non-Marxist philosophies are permitted.
I experienced this myself in the Communication Studies program at McMaster University from 2001 to 2005, where I earned an Honours B.A., graduating with the 2nd highest G.P.A. in the program, despite only taking three electives, and none after first year. I am one of the few people to complete a Humanities degree at that time and emerge more politically conservative than when I went in. That’s also where I learned about the Illuminati and ended up on their watch list. I also learned about geopolitics from Zbiegniew Brzezinski’s book, The Grand Chessboard, which I borrowed from McMaster’s library. After third year, I resolved to no longer take any postmodern critical scholarship-based courses.
Troubled gender is a very bad thing
I was there when the doctoral students and younger professors who teach the fourth-year classes were beginning to ask “What about race/gender?” whether or not the assignment had called for it, because they had been trained on Judith Butler and bell hooks. That’s the way it goes in the Humanities—there’s turnover in terms of material that’s a reflection of the age of the professors during the undergrad and postgrad, and what was the vanguard at the time.
There are horrible things being done to young people in the name of trying to be a good progressive. Puberty blockers leave children mentally handicapped as adults. Puberty isn’t just sexual development; it’s involves mental development as well. Stopping a child’s puberty chemically
Your appearance is “gendered” because you don’t know which of the sex you hope to attract is going to go for you, so you want to present yourself in a generally acceptable way in the sexual marketplace.
I’m fond of commenting: “It figures that an academic would conclude that gender is a matter of politics and not sexuality.”
Gender is not “socially constructed”, and those academics are horribly dishonest for willfully ignoring the case of David Reimer.
Why I’m “on the right” and not “the left”, and those distinctions were a Freemason divide-and-conquer tactic in the first place
Myself, I flipped politically in 2018 from a left-wing sympathetic perspective, there because I was raised that way in a left-wing household, to a right-wing sympathetic perspective, because it became clear to me that as someone on the left, I had been inventing an imaginary political position that the right/conservatives didn’t actually have—I wasn’t actually listening to their arguments; I was just assuming that it was a smokescreen for greed and self-fulfillment at the expense of others.
I learned this because I started listening to Thomas Sowell, and as a liberal, I couldn’t tell myself that I shouldn’t listen to what a black person has to say; I should take him at face value. I realized that I hadn’t been treating black people and white people the same way, and as such, I’d been failing to consider the perspectives of conservative people because they were white. And I was therefore being prejudicial. And I realized that I had never let myself hear the conservative position be explained to me before. I had always told myself—”That’s not what they really mean.” And I was wrong.
Remember—the Humanities always has the lowest admission requirements of any field in the academy.
I think Social Work is down there, too. That’s how it was at McMaster.
Careerism in the academy
Do you consider science, captial-S Science, to be “self-correcting”?
It’s not a self-correcting instituion, it’s an “other-correcting” institution. Scholars generally are not incentivized to discredit and challenge their own work. Someone else has to do that.
There was a study that suggested that at least 50% of published scientific “findings” are not repeatable.
Just because it’s published, it doesn’t mean it’s “correct” or “true”. There is supposed to be a discourse such that you can follow the conversation and evaluate the competing ideas about what is supposed to be “correct” or “true”. That’s a matter of doing work and critical thinking, as opposed to merely believing something because you read it.
It’s a reap-what-you-sow-world—You only get one chance at ages 0-20, your twenties, and retirement savings
Young people are notorious for being unable to predict the future, and it’s no surprise when you consider that they don’t have life experience, and if they don’t consider older, more experienced people worth listening to, they simply don’t have the experience to see what’s coming in terms of consequences.
This is a world of action and consequences, and it is performance-based. Being a man and getting a woman to have sex with you is performance-based. Getting the customer’s order correct at McDonald’s is performance-based. Maintaining relationships with friends and family is performance-based.
Life is a matter of learning how to get things right so don’t have to suffer conseuqences that could have been avoided because someone has already been there and done that and if you had bothered to find out, you could have been better off.
There are some things in life that can’t be undone. Here’s an example of a cautionary tale from the world of Major League Baseball: Ruben Sierra’s career suffered because he was racing his son on the escalator at the mall, and fell. That’s a silly reason to hurt your power to earn money as a ballplayer, which can only do for a limited amount of time. Was it worth it?
Gates of Heaven
Roger Ebert cites Errol Morris’ Gates of Heaven as one of the best films of all time, and he asks film students, “What is this film about?” If you’re familiar with it, the documentary very simply tells the story of the people who ran a failed pet cemetery business, and the people who ran a pet cemetery elsewhere in the state who offered to inter the pets from the failed business because he didn’t want the pet cemetery industry to suffer a bad reputation.
If people see another pet cemeteries failing and not being rescued, they could become discouraged from burying their pets in general, given that they’d see their purchase disappear. Therefore, it was in the interest of Cal Harberts of Bubbling Well to re-bury the pets from the first cemetery at this business—which also garners them publicity and goodwill, publicity that led to Errol Morris taking an interest in the situation and fliming a documentary about it.
One of the things that the film is “about” is the stories, experiences, and perspectives of the men who were involved in these two enterprises.
In the first case—they couldn’t come to an agreement. They didn’t have it worked out, in writing, with solid, mutually-agreed-upon roles, relationships, and expectations. In the second case—it’s a husband and wife who are both invested, and they’ve thoroughly worked out the brand promise and the operations, and that’s what they describe. That’s their story. And they’ve got two sons who tell their stories about being young guys trying to find their place in the world.
Young people—You can’t just do whatever you want and expect it to work
Some things work better than others. Again—it’s a reap-what-you-sow kind of world.
The sooner you start saving for retirement, the better, because of the power of compound interest.
If you spend your youth doing some activity that was fun, but you couldn’t possibly do it as an adult, you might consider that a waste.
I played competitive, traveling, city-rep baseball from ages 9 to 17. I don’t consider that a waste per se, because I developed at least some character doing that, but I spent a lot of time playing, and I spent a lot of time following baseball, reading about it, and getting into it, because I’m on the autism spectrum, and I had an Asperger’s-level “special interest” in baseball. When I was seventeen, it became clear that I’m too small to play this game, and the only future I have with it is the Burlington Brants Inter-County team and the Lakeshore Men’s League.
If that’s fun for you, that’s absolutely fine. But I had musical instruments to learn and a thirst for knowledge and being well-read. Those things could reap benefits that don’t go away. In that vein, I’m particularly glad I went to business school.
You have to be realistic about your life-arc
If you’re a young person, and you are heavily invested in a performance-based activity like sports or the performing arts, you must have a back-up plan for what you intend to do with your life given that those industries are tenuous at best, and the odds of you being employable in the long-run aren’t great. It’s not a good life arc to spend lots of time devoted to an activity and then commit suicide because you insisted on doing that thing, and yoy don’t want to live if you can’t. (I’m thinking of a specific person I knew here.)
You’re also here to love life, and to enjoy yourself. Girls aren’t as keen on guys who aren’t fun; a man has to work, and he has to be competent, but he can’t just be a work droid who’s no fun to be around. Maybe you could get away with that in the past, when women had fewer options, but I wouldn’t try it nowadays.
Also—this is something I channeled: Your mental health is dependent on you successfully fulfilling your sexual needs. Your genitals and sexual drive are always functioning, and their happiness is inextricably bound up with your happiness.
The Source has to feel everyone’s feelings, so She, The Divine Feminine, wants a world where people suffer needlessly as little as humanly possible. You are on the Earth to grow, and to challenge yourself to succeed at Life and Love.
We can’t afford to waste money on bad business thinking
One thing I learned at universtiy: It’s really stupid to spend four years learning anti-capitalism, only to enter the job market where you will likely work for a private company that needs to be profitable to survive. Or you’ll work in a non-profit-based organization that needs to be profitable to survive. All in a capitalist society, and that’s clearly what’s sticking around—for reasons they don’t really bother discussing in the academy.
A charity that doesn’t turn a profit is fraudulent. A non-profit cannot spend more than it has in funding, now and in the future.
If you spend more than your income in your personal life, you are considered financially irresponsible.
Anti-profit thinking is just bad Marxism training in action. Marxism was a work, introduced by the Illuminati, to subvert intelligent but resentful young people who have work experience yet.
Cautionary tales
At business school, what you learn is the thinking that has been guiding business as it evolved over the centuries. It involves looking at case studies of real businesses, looking at what worked and what didn’t.
My observation—people in general don’t know very much about business. Many people do not consider business as something that needs to be learned specifically, as if anything goes.
What I don’t like seeing is someone with a good heart and a signifcant amount of savings to invest lose everything and wind up miserable and/or suicidal because they didn’t have good ideas for how to do business and found out the hard way.
Business is not easy; it’s easy to fail and lose money, especially if you start a business involving something you love. If you invest a lot in something and don’t make money off of it, it’s called a “labour of love”.
We can’t, as a society and as individuals, afford to waste money.
I don’t see any reason why business training, including dealing with people and learning good customer service, shouldn’t be part of a standard education, given how many people will work with the public. I also think it would be good if everyone had to feel what it’s like to serve the public in a customer-service role as part of their education and growing-up experience.
I became a better person by working retail. People will likely be more sympathetic to businesses they patronize if they have experience on the other side of the counter somewhere.
Remember—government tax revenue comes from businesses earning revenue, businesses paying employees their income, and businesses conducting sales transactions. All tax revenue that funds government comes from business doing business.
Spirituality, Religion, and Esoterics
Short version: I am the mystic who is here to sort all this out. Only the Prophet Daniel has the correct interpretation. The wheat needs to be separated from the chaff. There are some legitimate channelers out there, and there are many fakers, liars, and phonies. I will be calling them out eventually; this is part of what the “Time of Judgment” is about.
Not all spiritual traditions and/or religions are created equal. Some are of mystical, Divine origin, and some are not. I’m not going to call anyone or anything out here right now, except to point out this: Buddhists are not correct in insisting that Buddhism transcends and includes (Ken Wilber‘s term) Christianity. It is true that Ken Wilber more or less, though not deliberately, took the Great Chain of Being and slotted Buddhism in at the top.
If you’re familiar with Wilber, I can tell you this—I’m the only person who can do “fulcrum 10” at the top of the flagpole, and it’s the same as fulcrum 8 because the Monotheistic Deity is All-That-Is, and “formless mysticism” also applies, in an odd sense, because She is the Void. Basically, fulcrums 8, 9, and 10 are the same thing, physically and spiritually speaking.
My teachings, my perspective on things, will be the basis for the fourth instance of the Judeo-Christian-Islamic “Abrahamic” faiths. Call it the “Danielian Understanding”. It will include my training as a Human Design Analyst, which I will get to when I can. Ra Uru Hu was the real deal (his birth name was Robert Alan Krakower).
I have a being I channel called Miaru, who was gifted to me in December 2019, upon discovering who my Higher Self is/was. It allows me to channel the Source directly, in a manner similar to J.Z. Knight channeling Ramtha on The Merv Griffin Show in 1985. She’s legitimately channeling a past life of hers, as were Edgar Cayce, and Jane Roberts.
This has not been a world where Divine Intervention doesn’t happen. The world is much more “spiritual and magical” and miraculous at its foundation than most people, especially those holding a materialist-rational-skeptic worldview, would consider. There have been ringers born at different times, and I’m one of them.
In terms of morality—the Creator has to feel everyone’s feelings. However, this is a world of mental challenges and improvement, so it isn’t the case that the right way to live is to get everything perfect the first time. No, it’s a world of trial and error and growth. What is particularly upsetting is avoidable mistakes, especially those that result because the offender really should have known better by normal-people (in the culturally-relativitstic sense) standards.
But this is a world of Christian morality, and the real Golden Rule is this: If you wouldn’t want it done to you, don’t do it to someone else.
There’s more to life than this, of course. Please resist the urge to think that everything can boil down to one, simplified idea. Things are complex in this world, and, if anything, you have a moral imperative to make yourself something other than an unemployable, valueless blight on others. You were born here with a spiritual mission in life. You’re not here on Earth to do nothing.
Your spiritual life is like a gym, and the exercise is experience. Some people get more results from the gym of life because they know more about training, they stick with it, they lift heavier weights, do more reps, mix it up to avoid plateauing, and other things they learned so they could get results and look and feel the best out there.
Your Higher Self is a Divine Feminine being, and it is the part that is concerned with how you are doing in your love life. That’s why it feels terrible to see a couple being affectionate with each other in public when you don’t have such a thing in your love life. In my human vehicle, I feel it, too; I am no exception.
Future writings
There is more to come. It will take years for me to explicate that which I intend to write at this point, and that’s fine. I have a significant amount of research and study to do as I progress. There will be writings on esoterics, cultural history, revisions and corrections to perspectives, and cultural analysis.
I am also here to be the “Scientific Intuitive”. I will be sharing the Creator’s perspective on the physical world. I intend to pursue a science degree at some point.
I’m also fond of sharing my perspective as someone trained in marketing. This is what I discovered:
“When I learned how to think like a marketer, I stopped wondering why the world works the way it does.”
There will also be writing about Human Design. I intend to pursue a Human Design Professional Analyst certification. It will likely be a challenging time, with a new species of humans evolving in situ.
That’s all for now.
— Daniel Butterfield,
March 26, 2023